I aint here to argue. I just pointed out what kind of person u are. And not in any world for any amount of cash id read this bunch of bullshit u wrote.
I aint here to argue. I just pointed out what kind of person u are. And not in any world for any amount of cash id read this bunch of bullshit u wrote.
I'm curious who told you that @Spectrus was working with us. In all honesty though if you think the path system used in the dynamic towns is the only thing we're doing with @Syntax then you're poorly mistaken. The code has come a long way since we first started using it also, it wasn't like we just opened an instruction manual and followed directions. Improvements have been made, things have been adjusted, added and removed not to mention it provided us an opportunity to test an issue with labels being skipped. We knew this was an issue about a month ago and now thanks to @Syntax & @DarkstaR the patch has been released to fix that exact issue.Originally Posted by XtrmJosh
Just like you, there are other people that question the reasoning behind some of the things we do but when I tell you that we have to add 'wait(2000)' to try fixing the issue of skipping labels, you'll just laugh until you experience it yourself, at that point you'll say "Omg its bugged, its your fault." when in fact it had nothing to do with the code. I told @Syntax & @Spectrus about this issue a long time ago but neither of them had encountered it before so how were they to really know what was going on? Now that it is fixed, sure, we can remove extra waits from our code by why waste the time doing that when we can update the entire script? The same logic applies to your bitching, why bother dissecting and complaining about old code when you can clearly see that we're switching everything as a whole? You're wasting your time and your "constructive criticism" means jack shit to us, as a team, since everything is already being changed. If you have an issue with how things are currently being done in the new code then feel free to let us know. I made a post on our thread a few nights ago, just as @Syntax did in the chat box, asking people to test our newly released [All] North Thais Trolls. We're looking for feedback concerning the functionality of the code itself, something that's right up your alley. So instead of bitching about old shit, download the new shit and try it out.
You asked if I had 'downs' syndrome but next time you're going to insult me, at least learn how to spell down (not downs) syndrome. I wouldn't use down syndrome as something to insult someone, its like if I asked you if you have a rare condition called vitiligo just because your avatar picture looks like you have dysfunctional skin pigmentation. On the contrary, it is just shit smeared all over that pretty little face of yours.
As for this remark: you claim you know what you're talking about and sure do love to act like you're better than everyone else. So how come you didn't see the part of code that said 'MinAmmo = 45' and 'MaxAmmo = 15'? Clearly this kept you in town, did you even bother looking at the setup before complaining about looping in town? I've seen you tell people to check the setup before starting a script, yet you fail to follow your own instructions resulting in your displeasure, caused by you. Your issue is that you're so high on that mighty horse than you can't even admit the fault was partially yours and even after you bitched about it, we fixed it within 25 minutes by flip flopping the values between the two locals. Yet you continued in attempt to chargeback the $3 you paid for the script, which you failed to succeed. If you actually want to help people, as you say you do, then stop bitching and moaning and actually help people instead.
Luckily for you, we have made a new piece of code that's aimed directly at your complaint. As I said on my Twitch channel, its the "anti-XtrmJosh bitch check" which checks for mistakes entered by the user and notifies them of the mistake so they, as a user, can read the message and make the applicable change without writing 3,025,309,583 walls of text bitching, just as you continue to do, about why they're getting stuck in town.
Concerning JXScripts Team:
@xiaospike @kopper @Syntax
I'm no longer interested in this conversation, you guys can post whatever you want in regards to this simpleton but I won't respond to him again, regardless of what's being said or any issues he may experience in the future. @XtrmJosh Anything further may be taken up with whoever in this team still gives a fuck about what you're ranting on about but I personally will not explain myself to you again. You're beating a dead horse, move on or shut the fuck up.
Thank you,
Joshwa534
@XtrmJosh
TL;DR
at the same time...
Last edited by xiaospike; 06-28-2013 at 08:27 PM.
I lol'd, Thanks
I actually meant to say Syntax, as I don't generally refer to either of them by their forum names due to the people I speak to on Skype. The reason I know they are working with you is because I am observant and aware. When I see something happening which is of interest to me, I will do my best to find out exactly what it is, especially when that is a reputable, well known, highly respected member of the forum linking your scripts.
If your code is constantly being improved, why are you still selling it in its old state? It gives a bad impression, and is generally a bad idea considering the way in which the code itself is working. I have not seen any improvements myself, and so far I've looked at a well sized array of both paid and free scripts made by your team. Admittedly I've only paid for 2, but I do have friends who buy scripts too, and when they don't work they come to me asking why, so I end up debugging them via TeamViewer and finding the issue. All of them that I've seen have been using this same code, with very few differences.
I've been aware of the majority of bugs on XB (having access to the bug tracking system helps), and I was aware of a bug in which some labels were skipped from time to time. The common workaround to the issue was to use Walker.Stop() and Walker.Start(), and in my experience that worked just fine. It still works just fine, and I'm encountering no issues with it. I see no reason why you would use a sleep, especially one of 2 seconds. Being as you're so aware of the current issues, surely you would also be aware of when they are fixed, and be one of the first to update your scripts to reflect the current state of the bot? Or do you not care about maintenance? Is your only interest drawing in customers by a large script base? The new shit as you refer to it is not suitable for any of my characters and I have no desire to bot any character at Thais north trolls. If you want a tester, as I've said to many other scripting teams in the past, I'd be more than willing to become that tester, but I would expect not only that the script works in a productive way, but also that the code itself looks respectable. I guess for the sheer fact that Syntax is writing all the Lua now, that won't really be necessary, since he does have an understanding of how to write as well as debug code before trying to shift it.
I really wish you'd done your research here, because the syndrome does in fact go by multiple names, both "Down's Syndrome" and "Down Syndrome". The fact that you'd even try to pull me up on that is ludicrous. On top of that, you're mocking my insults after the shit you and your team has been throwing around? My avatar is in fact a picture of myself which was modified using an app on my old iPhone. Would've thought that it would be quite obvious to you, then again you shouldn't ever show a fool a brick and tell him it's a meal.
The first script I bought from you had a setup which any reasonable minded person would expect to work out of the box. I flicked through the variables, looking to run it and get off to bed quickly, and noticed the script walking back and forth in town, so had to stop the script and leave it. The fact that you'd sell a script with a setup which will cause that behaviour is just insane. As mentioned several times, it demonstrates a clear lack of testing and the simple desire to get scripts sold without thinking about the consequences. I attempted to charge back the $3 out of principle. The reason I didn't proceed with the chargeback? Out of respect for DarkstaR. The only reason I didn't proceed with that is because you threatened to leave the forums, and your script base would have been depleted as a result. The fact is, you retards do have something to offer, regardless of how shit it is in current state. The reason I'm willing to proceed now? Well, I'm sick of seeing the tripe that gets flogged on this forum, and I'm sick and tired of friends coming to me when your scripts don't work. You're forgetting, I lead the guild on Olympa, and the majority of the members speak to me on Skype. On top of that, probably 30% or more of the community who don't play Olympa also speak to me for various other reasons, so whenever someone buys one of your scripts there is a good chance that they will talk to me as a first point of call, since I'm online all day at work and for a good few hours in the evening. I get harassed on a daily basis about scripts from all corners of this forum, and yours are by far the most common that I get asked about.
You cannot fail, so I'm lowering the standard.
@XtrmJosh
Nobody likes you, just GTFO.
You really think I care if anyone in this thread likes me? You really must have some serious issues if you expected me to ever think that. As I've said to a number of people, I'm not here to be liked, I'm here to benefit the general community.
You cannot fail, so I'm lowering the standard.
But all you do is destroy the good mood. If you could just do something for the community instead of bragging about it. Like make some scripts for the Community LUA thread me and JXScipts + Spectrus made. That's something that really benefits the community.
I mean no offence to @Syntax when I say this, but isn't that exactly what you're now joining up to dispel? I mean, what's happening is you're starting to make scripts using obfuscated code... It's kinda completely the opposite, you're actually taking code which could otherwise be incredibly useful, and making it (relatively speaking) useless to anyone else, except for the purpose of running the script. In doing that you're hardly helping the community, far from it, you're actually hindering the community.
With regards to what I do, well, I go by the well known prophecy Give a man a fish, feed him for a day, teach a man to fish, feed him for life. I don't like to release bits of Lua code to people when I could potentially teach them to write it for themselves...
You cannot fail, so I'm lowering the standard.
The code I obfuscate is the code that is very specific to how our system operates. Most of it can be of little use to it, and even more of it people wouldn't be able to understand. The people who could understand it would be able to make it anyway.
The code I release to the public are things that I feel the community could use, modify, and adapt to their own code. As you have already said the proverb, I don't have to repeat it.
Tutorials are great, but when learning you need to see real applications, and even better, a template to work off of.
When you teach something to a person, you show them example problems and give them the answers to them, but you don't hand them all the answers, they will never learn.
All that being said, I'm not a saint, this is a business. I give back to the community because I feel like I should, but I'm not obligated to. This is why there is a free and paid version of XenoMap.
Both benefit the community. Some people don't want to learn shit, they'd rather pay money for scripts, and that's just fine. Not everyone has time or the interest in scripting. I/We cater to both.
edit: Btw, no offense, but half your post said that obfuscated code is bad and the code would be useful, the other half you said you don't like to release bits of code when they could write it themselves. Wat?
Last edited by Syntax; 06-28-2013 at 10:18 PM.
Posting Permissions
