Bought scrolls in-game
Bought 1 month each month for RL-cash
Bought 3-12+ months each 3-12 months for RL-cash
Had a subscription
Free Account
Has not been banned
Other (please post details)
Statistically and mathematically, this is a flawed way to prove a point or get any real idea on the figure. Since the distribution of premium purchases is unevenly and unmeasurably skewed towards shorter times, there is no way to make sense of this poll in any way that matters other than to just exist.
If you really want some insight on this theory, you need to get multiple, equally distributed groups for each option and to look within them.
I understand what you mean, but that would require more time etc. If we get many votes we can still get a picture of it, maybe not 100%.Originally Posted by DarkstaR
No. You will get no picture of anything. That's my point.
I'm not sure how you think numbers work, but when you're missing 3 parts of a 4 part equation, you cannot solve it.
Well, I don't think that he is trying to get a solution, just something to evaluate, like you said it's not possible to solve an equation without having so many parts missing, however the more parts you have the more accurate guess or several guesses you can make.
I believe this is just non-sense anyways, like the theory about older accounts that should have some strange power against the banhammer.
Even tho this would make more sense, since it is about their income afterall.
Perhaps not the worst way to start evaluating whether cip are really picking and choosing who they ban. Perhaps if we poll enough theroies we can start to see if any have stock to them.
Yea, exactly what I thought!
Posting Permissions
