another visit from our "old as fuck" "cipsoft emmber" "inactive" friend...
@Syntax @DarkstaR @HolmaN @Infernal Bolt @XtrmJosh
http://oi41.tinypic.com/2v0fuk9.jpg
another visit from our "old as fuck" "cipsoft emmber" "inactive" friend...
@Syntax @DarkstaR @HolmaN @Infernal Bolt @XtrmJosh
http://oi41.tinypic.com/2v0fuk9.jpg
good thing i lost premium yesterday ;p
Why the fuck was the staff mentioned?
http://forums.xenobot.net/showthread...ur-bot-casinos
Don't forget me!Originally Posted by HolmaN
Position: CipSoft Member
This person isn't actually a GM, but an employee at CipSoft. Given the quantity of, and the severity of the situation caused by the dice bots, this is becoming a real issue for CipSoft, therefore it is entirely understandable for them to login to a promoted account and delete players manually. Note that these players emit some very bot like behaviour, as a result they will manually banish them.
The reason CIP don't manually ban botters
The banishments marked as using unofficial software to play interferes with the statistical analysis when variables are thrown in. Every player who is banned has his data logged, and it is used for future comparisons between players when determining if a person is botting or not. That means if they ban someone who emits very few signs of being a botter, they are adding statistics which are suggestive that the player was botting in spite of little statistical, although considerable quantities of observable evidence. This could cause havoc in their automatic detection system, making it ban other players who emit the same signs of botting, even though they could be playing completely manually. Dice botters don't really count towards this for a number of reasons. The primary being (and this is a speculation) that they can exclude all results from characters under level 8, as these are a very insignificant part of the botting problem. Additionally, they can tell a dice botter equally through automation or through manually logging in. This is not difficult, nor is it obtrusive with their detection system, as the insignificance of their level likely means they would not be considered by the automated system regardless of any banishment.
Hope some of that made sense. Interesting to see, though.
You cannot fail, so I'm lowering the standard.
@HolmaN well since u guys manage this site you can spread the info faster than me.... and include possible alarms, as far as we know she is logging in on everyserver deleteing every casino bot she sees, and every char she/he uses has the GM on their names ... thats why i did so... dont get mad ¬¬
But there was already a thread for it mate.
@Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz @Alastorsz
Don't tag me in random useless threads.
I doubt you know the annoyance of being spammed with mentions/pm's
hahahahahahahaha good one mate
Posting Permissions
