Is XenoBot a good bot for scripters?

[Joshwa534]

I won't write too much here but there's only one moderator and one admin in the so-called Skype chat you're talking about. At least the one you accused me of in your PM. Neither of us own a single Solid Script file thus being impossible to share them. There are some people that share scripts, mine included, but what are you expecting to happen? I cannot ban them via Skype and I don't know who half of the people in the Skype group.

You can be disappointed all you want but when I confronted you directly on Skype before about username locking your scripts and using better encryption, you claimed you have no desire to ever username lock your scripts and did not care if people shared them. That was just a few months ago, have things changed? If so, there's a function: getUserName() - its been available for over a year, use it.

That's just my 2 cents, don't ever accuse me of sharing your shit again.

[Nakuu]

If you can stop being a kid and don't post if you do have nothing constructive to say that would be great. If you are acting like a child on serious matters I instantly I assume you are the one who shares the scripts and are just against the protection.

[Joey]

If you can stop being a kid and don't post if you do have nothing constructive to say that would be great. If you are acting like a child on serious matters I instantly I assume you are the one who shares the scripts and are just against the protection.

Nah that would be me

[kimse]

If XB doesn't have a feature that prevents sharing, how come both JX and 4Pan develop scripts that prevents their scripts from being shared?

Food for thought.

[raiQi]

getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()getUserName()


Problem solved?? Everybody happy?

[Nakuu]

I won't write too much here but there's only one moderator and one admin in the so-called Skype chat you're talking about. At least the one you accused me of in your PM. Neither of us own a single Solid Script file thus being impossible to share them. There are some people that share scripts, mine included, but what are you expecting to happen? I cannot ban them via Skype and I don't know who half of the people in the Skype group.

You can be disappointed all you want but when I confronted you directly on Skype before about username locking your scripts and using better encryption, you claimed you have no desire to ever username lock your scripts and did not care if people shared them. That was just a few months ago, have things changed? If so, there's a function: getUserName() - its been available for over a year, use it.

That's just my 2 cents, don't ever accuse me of sharing your shit again.

I didn't you accused for shit, just asked nicely but seems like you don't hide with this anymore. Anyway, if obfuscation is so good why don't you use it yourself?

If XB doesn't have a feature that prevents sharing, how come both JX and 4Pan develop scripts that prevents their scripts from being shared?

Food for thought.

Which can be easily decrypted and all it takes is just one kid with no life who cares enough to do that. Also I got some real stuff going on that I care about more so I ain't got time for finding the ways to protect my scripts if there is already one that DarkstaR won't share except his rl friend, lol. Seems legit.

[Pietro1906]

Which can be easily decrypted and all it takes is just one kid with no life who cares enough to do that.

Honestly that's all it takes to decrypt/hack/crack/break anything.

Welcome to the internet.

[Nakuu]

Thank you for your opinion, Rydan. One of few mature people here

[Pietro1906]

Thank you for your opinion, Rydan. One of few mature people here

Apparently you have to support Nakuu's opinion to be mature.

Oh and since you keep bringing up that topic, here's a quote from a guy much smarter than me.

“Critics who treat 'adult' as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence. And in childhood and adolescence they are, in moderation, healthy symptoms. Young things ought to want to grow. But to carry on into middle life or even into early manhood this concern about being adult is a mark of really arrested development. When I was ten, I read fairy tales in secret and would have been ashamed if I had been found doing so. Now that I am fifty I read them openly. When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up.”

-- C.S. Lewis

[Nakuu]

Apparently you have to support Nakuu's opinion to be mature.

No, just look at his post and yours. Do you see a difference?